home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: hermes.oc.com!usenet
- From: R@Net.com (The Manager)
- Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.comp.virus,alt.crackers,alt.cracks,alt.cyberspace,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.unixware.misc
- Subject: Re: I will NEVER buy Windows 95 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-(
- Date: 14 Jan 1996 19:00:29 GMT
- Organization: Nets'R'Us
- Message-ID: <4dbjsd$cpn@hermes.oc.com>
- References: <4d9iri$7n0@news.mcn.net> <4d9ru5$47t@ns2.ptd.net> <4d9vg3$5266@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <30fa02e4.433083@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
- Reply-To: R@nets.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: acme.etsu.edu
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.2
-
- >I read a message from someone in alt.games who had the DOS & Windoze95
- >version of Mechwarrior2. Guess what? The DOS version ran at a decent
- >rate, even at 640x480, while the Windoze version was slow as hell.
- >Can someone explain why this new technologically advanced "OS" runs
- >worse than DOS?
-
- It runs so bad in Windows because it probably wasn't complied correctly
- for 95. They probably run stuck a Win 95G window over the old DOS app.
-
- _______________________________________________________________________
- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- ________________________________________________________________________
-
-